Evidence was factually sufficient to support deadly
conduct adjudication. [In the Matter of Z.J.R.](10-2-15)
On March 3, 2010, the San Antonio Court of Appeals
held that evidence was factually sufficient to support juvenile's adjudication
as delinquent based upon commission of offense of deadly conduct.
10-2-15. In the Matter of Z.J.R., MEMORANDUM,
No. 04-09-00008-CR, 2010 WL 724398 (Tex.App.-San Antonio, 3/3/10).
Facts: At trial, twenty-five-year-old Jimmy Arroyo
testified that on July 12, 2008, at approximately 9:30 p.m., he was outside his
mother's home, sitting on a concrete ditch with his brother, Mark Arroyo, and
his friend, Alberto Hoffman. According to Jimmy, a teenage boy whom Jimmy later
identified as Z.J.R. was walking up and down the street with a friend, I.O., in
front of Jimmy's mother's home. Jimmy testified that he knew Z.J.R. and I.O.
only by their nicknames. Jimmy heard Z.J.R. call Mark a pussy. According to
Jimmy, the next time Z.J.R. walked by, Z.J.R. stated that he had his nine on
him with a fully loaded clip.
Jimmy testified that around midnight, he decided to
leave his mother's home and was backing his GMC Yukon out of the driveway when a
Chevy Cobalt, driven by Z.J.R.'s brother, stopped in the middle of the street.
Jimmy could see Z.J.R. sitting in the passenger seat of the Cobalt. Jimmy's
brother, Mark, was standing on the sidewalk, and his friend, Alberto, was
standing in the driveway. According to Jimmy, he said to Z.J.R.'s older brother,
There's three of y'all; there's three of us, and if y'all want to fight, we can
fight. Jimmy then saw Z.J.R. pull out a small handgun and point it at Mark.
Jimmy turned on his bright headlights, and Z.J.R. pointed the gun in the air and
fired. Jimmy testified that Z.J.R.'s brother then reversed the Cobalt a
distance, stopped, revved the engine, and then raced the Cobalt toward the
Yukon. At the last minute, the Cobalt swerved and clipped the front of the
Yukon's bumper.
According to Jimmy, Alberto then ran to the home of
Jimmy's in-laws, who lived behind his mother's home on the next street, to tell
them to keep the children inside. Mark then got into the Yukon, and Jimmy
circled to the next block where his in-laws lived. Alberto then got inside the
Yukon, and Mark called 911. Jimmy testified that he drove around the
neighborhood looking for the Cobalt in an attempt to retrieve the license plate
number. As Jimmy was driving around the neighborhood, he heard three shots, one
of which struck and shattered the back window of the Yukon. Jimmy turned quickly
on another street in an attempt to head back toward his mother's home. As he
approached an intersection, he saw the Cobalt headed toward him and heard more
shots fire. He tried to turn left, but the Cobalt cut him off, causing the two
vehicles to collide. Jimmy heard someone yell, Shoot them! He then saw Z.J.R.
kind of sitting on the door on his side, hanging over the car, point the gun
and start [ ] shooting. Jimmy testified that he and his brother ducked, and he
backed up the Yukon in an attempt to escape. He then heard five to seven shots,
one of which hit the front windshield on the driver's side and one of which hit
the driver's side door while he was backing up the Yukon. He then drove to a
fast food restaurant where he, Mark, and Alberto waited for police to arrive.
Mark testified to the same sequence of events as his
brother, Jimmy. He saw Z.J.R. shoot the gun into the air during their first
encounter with the Cobalt. Mark then got into the Yukon and called 911. He was
told by the dispatcher that the police needed the license plate number. Mark
testified that as they were traveling down a street in the neighborhood, he
heard about three shots, and then heard the fourth shot hit and shatter the back
window of the Yukon. According to Mark, Jimmy then turned left on a street that
forms a circle. At the next intersection, Mark saw the Cobalt again, heard two
shots, and ducked. The Yukon then collided with the Cobalt. Mark testified that
he then looked up and saw Z.J.R. hanging out the window and start shooting.
Thus, both Mark and Jimmy testified that Z.J.R. was the one who shot at them.
Similarly, Alberto testified that he saw Z.J.R. shoot
at them. According to Alberto, during their first encounter with the Cobalt, he
saw Z.J.R. in the passenger seat, heard him say, I am going to shoot you, and
then saw him point the gun at Mark. Alberto testified that when Jimmy flashed
his headlights, Z.J.R. snapped out of it and pointed the gun [in] the air and
took one shot. When Alberto heard a shot go off, he ducked down behind some
branches. Later, after warning Jimmy's family to get all the children inside,
Alberto got into the Yukon with Jimmy and Mark so that they could get the
license plate number of the Cobalt. Alberto testified that the Cobalt then
pulled up behind the Yukon and three shots were fired. The third shot blew
out the rear window. According to Alberto, Jimmy then accelerated, trying to
get away and back to his mother's home. However, before they could get back to
Jimmy's mother's home, they collided with the Cobalt. Alberto testified that he
could clearly see Z.J.R.:
[Z.J.R.] just had his whole body out and was pointing
forward like that. He was getting a clear view of us to see [whom] he could
shoot, and I could see him through the front window where he was at [sic], and
he was pointing down and shooting at the vehicle.
Thus, Alberto, Jimmy, and Mark all testified that they
clearly saw Z.J.R. fire the shots.
Z.J.R. testified in his own defense. According to
Z.J.R., on the night of July 12, 2008, he went to his cousin's birthday party in
Seguin where he met a man named Eddie, who showed him a gun outside in a rural
area. Z.J.R. testified that he had never fired a gun before, and that Eddie let
him handle the gun and fire it into a bale of hay in the backyard of his
cousin's home. He left the party with his brother, his brother's girlfriend
Heather, his friend I.O., and Eddie. Z.J.R. testified that they dropped Heather
home first, and as they were returning to their subdivision, their car, a Chevy
Cobalt, collided with a Yukon. Z.J.R. was sitting in the passenger seat and his
brother was driving. Z.J.R. testified that after the cars collided, he heard
gunshots, but did not know who fired them. According to Z.J.R., after hearing
gunshots, he quickly got out of the car and ran away.
When asked who Eddie was, Z.J.R. testified that he
had never met Eddie before that night, and that his brother, Heather, and I.O.
did not know Eddie either. According to Z.J.R., Eddie was in the car because he
had offered Z.J.R.'s brother $30 for a ride to San Antonio.
Held: Affirmed
Memorandum Opinion: Z.J.R. argues that the
evidence is factually insufficient because of testimony from the one neutral
witness, Crystina Vachon, a forensic scientist. Vachon testified that she found
three microscopic particles containing lead, barium, and antimony on Z.J.R .'s
right hand, and four particles on his left hand. According to Vachon, [b]ased
on morphology and elemental composition of the particles, Z.J.R. may have
discharged a firearm, handled a discharged firearm, or was in close proximity to
a discharged firearm. In support of his sufficiency argument, Z.J.R. emphasizes
Vachon's testimony that a firearm will create more residue the more times it's
fired. According to Z.J.R., this testimony is consistent with him firing a few
gunshots at the party in Seguin and is not consistent with him firing a gun
multiple times, as claimed by the State's witnesses.
In making this argument, however, Z.J.R. ignores much
of Vachon's testimony. While Vachon did testify that a firearm will create more
residue when fired multiple times, she explained she cannot determine how many
times a gun was fired based on the number of particles found on a person's
hands. According to Vachon, while she would anticipate more particles to be
created, [t]hat does not translate into more being found on the hands.
In addition to Vachon's testimony, Z.J.R. argues that
Jimmy, Mark, and Alberto were not consistent in their testimony regarding the
number of shots fired. Z.J.R. also points to the recordings of the calls made to
911, arguing that if Mark and Jimmy were being truthful, Mark would have
identified Z.J.R. on the calls, as both he and Jimmy knew Z.J.R. by his nickname
and knew where his friend I.O. lived. Z.J.R. also argues that unlike what Mark
testified to, the 911 dispatchers never asked for a license plate number. Z.J.R.
claims that the reason for these inconsistencies is obvious. According to
Z.J.R., [t]he shots were not fired by Z.J.R., but by Eddie. Z.J.R. argues that
such a theory is consistent with the great weight and preponderance of the
evidence, while the theory that Z.J.R. fired the shots is not.
Such credibility questions, however, are the province
of the jury. Jimmy, Mark, and Alberto all testified that they saw Z.J.R. fire
the gun. Z.J.R. testified that he was not the person who fired those shots.
Conclusion: When contradictory testimonial
evidence turns on an evaluation of credibility and demeanor of the witnesses, we
must defer to the jury. See Johnson v. State, 23 S.W.3d 1, 8
(Tex.Crim.App.2000). We, therefore, hold that the evidence is factually
sufficient and affirm the trial court's judgment.